Listen to the audio version of this article:
Addiction is a disease. Our program is going to discuss this disease on a very deep level over many sessions. You’ll understand some of the pathways in your brain connected to opioid addiction or alcoholism. We’ll explore avenues of therapy such as insight-oriented therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy. This will help you feel comfortable with peer support programs and work a program more effectively.
To start our discussion, let’s lay out some of the data around the most common addiction – alcoholism. It is the most common addiction treated in medical centers, and about 85% of inpatient rehab patients meet the criteria for this condition. Each year, Alcohol Use Disorder (the medical term for alcoholism according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5)) afflicts 14-15% of men and 5-7% of women. Over a person’s lifetime, it affects between 41-43% of men and 17-19% of women.[I]
This session will look at the most basic components of alcoholism as it has been viewed in a cultural context. These principles are easily transferrable to you if you have a primary opioid addiction or any other addictive process. The disease components seem to be the same from addiction to addiction.
It is common for people to feel confused about the concept of alcoholism as a disease. We often think of diseases as passive conditions that will affect ‘innocent’ people. Because of the stigma in the way people view addictive disorders, it is common to describe alcoholism as someone’s ‘fault.’ This session will help dispel common arguments against alcoholism being a disease. By fully embracing this concept, we will help you to view recovery as a commitment to health. Therefore, any path of recovery must emphasize this goal of health above all.
Let’s begin by listing the core ingredients making alcohol use disorder a disease process.
Alcoholism impacts the body on a cellular, tissue, and organ-system level:
Alcoholism has about 50% genetic links
Alcoholism is effectively treated with a medical model of care
The following are some of the historical models to describe alcoholism. It is important to understand where these theories came from and our approaches today. The discussion around alcoholism connects to religious, political, psychological, and public health arenas.
In the early part of the 20th century, alcoholism was a condition of ‘poor moral character’ and lack of integrity. The temperance movement, an attempt to improve multiple social problems in the United States, popularized prohibition beginning in 1920. By preventing access to alcohol, the country would, in theory, be more productive and with greater moral character. Religious groups strongly condemned alcoholism as a path of sin and the alcoholic was someone who had not fully embraced the love of God.
Even 1940’s textbooks on psychiatry listed moral failings as a common cause of alcoholism. It wasn’t until the first 1950’s laboratory studies on rats that this started to change. Experiments showed that a rat would preferentially pull levers to receive cocaine in such a repetitive fashion that the rat would eventually starve to death. These pioneer animal models ushered in the beginning of the disease model of addiction. It was hard to convince anyone that the cocaine-addicted rats had some deficit in moral fiber. Maybe humans who had developed addiction were struggling with similar brain dysfunction issues as these rats?
The first peer support group for alcoholism was Alcoholic’s Anonymous, developed in 1935 by founders Bill Wilson and Dr. Bob Smith. A few years earlier, in 1931, one of the initial members of AA was a young man named Roland who had undergone 1 year of psychoanalysis under the care of Dr. Carl Jung, the renowned psychiatrist from Switzerland. It was believed that a remodeled version of psychoanalysis and in-depth therapy developed to treat conditions such as depression and hysteria could cure alcoholism.
There were numerous initial psychological theories of why alcoholism developed in the brain. One included a sense of an unmet oral need from childhood for which alcohol consumption would meet. Another theory involved a developmental sense of inferiority which would become masked through the defense mechanism of alcoholic inebriation, a dysfunctional coping skill.
It was Jung who first objected to the use of psychoanalysis to treat alcoholism when he stated to the above-named Roland that he could not offer anything to resolve this man’s alcoholism from a psychological perspective. The only bit of advice he did give, which has become a core theme of healing amongst many AA participants, was that a spiritual awakening experienced by the alcoholic could prompt a drive to remain sober. So in a sense, Dr. Jung helped promote some of the earliest cases of recovery not through his treatment of choice, psychoanalysis, but rather through a spiritual and group support mentality.
The more recent literature on this topic has compartmentalized psychology and alcoholism as highly associated but not cause-and-effect based. This basically means that insight-focused psychotherapy can aid someone in their recovery but that it may not be enough to help establish recovery at first. For initial recovery to happen, the brain needs some basic healing including progressing through some early sobriety days.
This past depiction of alcoholism has, in many ways, held the poorest prognosis for those afflicted. The assumption in an old-fashioned public health model was that ‘the inebriates’ would continue drinking alcoholically and that we could not offer them much as a health community. Promoted instead were efforts to sequester alcoholics from the rest of the population. These ranged from the pub system to sanitariums for locking away alcoholics, and ultimately incarceration for chronic alcohol abusers. Significant punitive measures around public intoxication or drunk driving would help decrease some binge behaviors, but would not really improve the outcomes for the true alcoholic. Repeated drunk driving offenses would eventually most likely incarcerate that person.
It is important to note that the criminal justice system is starting to utilize scientific evidence to improve outcomes, the most notable of these being the emergence of Drug Courts. These programs acknowledge the chronic disease nature of addiction and the need to foster supportive treatment and goal-based progress rather than simply incarceration. The success of Drug Courts has been significant in that 18-month participants in these programs have shown as high as 42% full abstinence from alcohol and drugs over that time.
We will be using the chronic disease model of alcoholism to explain the science behind your addiction and the path of healing. Overall, this model can be the most comforting to patients in that it reduces the stigma around your health problems and emphasizes sensible, evidence-based roads to change. It also provides the greatest view of hope in recovery. Recovery is all about making a health commitment while holding honest acceptance of the disease process.
The most applicable metaphor to consider for yourself is the chronic disease of Diabetes. This condition runs most parallel with addiction. The take-home points for this metaphor are as follows:
As we move onto upcoming sessions, we will revisit much of the chronic disease model and connect back to this diabetes metaphor. The value in this educational content for you will be strong and sensible. Use the information discussed in each session to enhance your discussions with your doctor, improve your therapy, work more closely with your sponsor, or reflect on your recovery needs by yourself. This program is meant to help all sorts of people struggling with their substance use and will review the best science has to offer.
[i] Streem, D. “Alcohol use disorders.” Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education. 2014